Go to PC Hardware main page
 
Advanced search here
Powered by www.pchardweb.com
Romaneste! You are not logged in. Register.  
05:47  
  All Motherboard Reviews

Today news
Tagan TG480-U01 480W ATX / EPS Power Supply Review
Logitech MX 510 Performance Optical Mouse
8 Video Cards Roundup
Samsung SyncMaster 173P LCD Monitor Review
Aerocool HT-101 AMD/P4 HSF Review
Top Systems
Sisoft Sandra 2002 / Multimedia Float (it/s)
Sisoft Sandra 2002 / Multimedia Int (it/s)
Sisoft Sandra 2002 / Memory Float (Mb/s)
Sisoft Sandra 2002 / Memory Int (Mb/s)
Sisoft Sandra 2002 / CPU ALU (MIPS)
Advertisement
User Reviews
Shuttle AV61
MSI k7t pro 2-a
Abit KT7A
Abit KT7A
plz help with motherboard
Featured downloads
RegSnap
WindowPictures
E-Icons
JumpReg
System Sentry

 
 
  Abit TH7II-RAID
Latest Motherboards | Recommended Motherboards
Final Mark: 23/25
Testing Methodology
 
 Date November 02, 2001
 Author CrackMaster
 Manufacturer Abit  | All Abit Motherboards
 Language English, Romanian

Flesk / Linux / Database

Content Creation 2001 created a gap between the SDRAM and RDRAM. Fortunately the situation will change early next year when Intel will come up with a DDR version of 845. Let's take a look to multimedia performance.

Flesk is more susceptible to CPU power than to memory bandwidth. Pentium 4 performs very good in such tests because encoding does not use many jump instructions which are highly penalized by the huge pipeline size.

Linux compilation tests reveal the CPU power and memory bandwidth advantage. As you can see from Linux compilation time test there are not amazing differences between Windows performance and Linux behavior. We compiled Linux five times on every motherboard. The maximum tolerated difference was +/- 5 seconds. Results out of this interval were removed.

Last week I presented you a short playback script designed by one of our administrators. The 845 chipset was penalized with several seconds due to the memory interface. When overclocked TH7II doesn't improve performance too much because SQL queries consume memory bandwidth not CPU power. We experienced only a 0.8s difference in a 310Mhz clock increase.


 

Newsletter
Receive reviews, news,
performance increase tips

Subscribe Leave
Info and privacy here.
Contents
Inside the article:
Page 1 Identification
Page 2 Specifications
Page 3 Installation
Page 4 Compatibility
Page 5 Reliability
Page 6 Performance
Page 7 Flesk / Linux / Database
Page 8 Conclusions
See also
Articles related to current:
Abit IC7-G
Abit BH7
Abit BG7E
Abit BE7-RAID
Troubleshoot ACPI problems
Motherboards testing methodology
Advertisement

Discuss this article into the forum
Print this article
Mail a quote from this review to a friend
Rate this review! Rating: 6
Add your review about Abit TH7II-RAID
Add your system to Performance Center
Next page:

About us | Contact us | Privacy policy | Forums | Members | Request a review

   @ 1998 - 2002 PC Hardware SRL. All rights reserved. Do you want to know more about Romania?